Microsoft 365 Copilot is designed to respect your existing permissions. It only surfaces organisational data a user already has at least view access to, and Microsoft states that prompts, responses, and data accessed through Microsoft Graph aren't used to train its foundation models. The real risk isn't Copilot. It's that most organisations have years of oversharing that nobody noticed until an assistant made everything easy to find.
According to Microsoft's documentation:
On data residency, Copilot is covered in Microsoft's data residency commitments, including Advanced Data Residency.
Think of a SharePoint site shared with "everyone" in 2019 for a project that ended long ago. Or a folder of HR spreadsheets with inherited permissions nobody reviewed. Before Copilot, these were technically accessible but practically invisible, because you had to know where to look.
Copilot removes the "knowing where to look" part. Ask it about salaries, restructures or a client's health information, and if a user can technically access a file that answers the question, Copilot can find it.
For Australian organisations handling health, aged care or other sensitive information, that isn't an abstract concern. It's personal information under the Privacy Act.
About the author Timotius Devin is AI Lead at PerData Technology Partners in Melbourne. At PerData he helps Australian organisations design, govern and deploy AI on the Microsoft platform.
Sources